tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6637736252081011583.post5548831830796746909..comments2023-10-23T11:13:47.199-07:00Comments on Daily Vim: Text Editor Tips, Tricks, Tutorials, and HOWTOs: GolfTravis Whittonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14592647486468034166noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6637736252081011583.post-75343768121921503992012-07-05T04:39:53.064-07:002012-07-05T04:39:53.064-07:00How about:
df";D+How about:<br /><br />df";D+dominikohttp://dominiko.livejournal.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6637736252081011583.post-90590077657887727162010-12-28T15:37:23.937-08:002010-12-28T15:37:23.937-08:00I don't like the shorter version you had (df&q...I don't like the shorter version you had (df"wD+ (6 chars)), becuase it uses w to go to the next word. If an entry had a non-word character, it wouldn't work. The f" was better in that regard.<br /><br />However, the di"Vp is brilliant. I have never heard of text objects. Must investigate...(sa)MAMMONhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04355756269392424234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6637736252081011583.post-83733301101878128212008-02-08T11:35:00.000-08:002008-02-08T11:35:00.000-08:00:%s/^.*"\(.*\)".*$/\1/a bit longer, but no macro r...:%s/^.*"\(.*\)".*$/\1/<BR/><BR/>a bit longer, but no macro repetition necessaryAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04871226658814740333noreply@blogger.com